Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 12:18

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Are you more of a butt guy or a boob guy?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How short is too short for a skirt?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Fake flight attendant took 120 free flights before arrest at SFO, officials say - SFGATE
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
30-Day No-Sugar, High-Fiber, Anti-Inflammatory Meal Plan, Created by a Dietitian - EatingWell
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Rocket Report: SpaceX’s 500th Falcon launch; why did UK’s Reaction Engines fail? - Ars Technica